Although the handcopy and
Hout Th.P.J. van den 1995c, 211 read the sequence
D10 in this personal name, the photograph clearly shows at least two Winkelhaken (
D20?), as correctly noted in
Sakuma Y. 2009b, II 129. The same writing appears also in the following obv. I 32 (likewise ignored in the handcopy). Should we assume a mistake for
D30 (or, less likely
D10?) in both instances? (See also note n. 7).