|
The present oracles concern the route which the Hittite army is to take on its way to attack the cities of Šaḫuzimiša and Daḫašda, with different individuals leading parts of the army in on different routes. The first inquiry suggests a very specific route, with the king stopping at Šapinuwa, the army at Ḫanziwa, before going to Šuppiluliya and finally to Šaḫuzima. Meanwhile Kašaluwa is to attack Daḫašda as is Kuniyaziti, attacking from the direction of Kuwarina, while Ašduwari and Timetti are to attack from Kammama.
|
|
KUB 22.51 is a fragment from a single-column tablet, with the surviving text well preserved. The layout is somewhat inconsistent, with the text on the obverse mostly being relatively compact, except for the much more spacious last four lines of the third paragraph. Much of the text on the reverse is similarly spacious, with the paragraphs containing a lot of blank space.
|
|
The text is written in a highly cursive, slanted script. The script is late New Hittite (diagnostic signs: DA, IT, TAR, note especially the IIIc form of ḪA).
|
|
This text is closely paralleled by KUB 50.108, an oracular inquiry which inquires about a very similar campaign route, which diverges from that of the present text only at the end (see Kryszeń A. 2016b, 329-330). Together, these two texts have been instrumental in determining the locations of Ḫanziwa, Šuppiluliya, Šaḫuzimiša, and Kuwarina, on which see Forlanini M. 1979a, 179, Forlanini M. 1992b, 288-289, Forlanini M. 2008a, 69, Forlanini M. 2008b, 146, Ünal A. 1998b, 29, Imparati F. 1999a, 172-174, Barjamovic G. 2011a, 284, Kryszeń A. 2016b, 329-330, Süel A. – Weeden M. 2017a, 201-202.
Some of the individuals names as potential leaders of different parts of the army in this text are attested elsewhere. For example, Ašduwari appears in KUB 21.9, obv. I 6, a fragment in which we see the concern of Ḫattušili III for Nerik when he was king of Ḫakmiš, located near the places mentined in this text. Timetti is also known from other texts from the time of Ḫattušili, including various oracular inquiries about military campaigns in the Kaskean region where, as in this text, he is tasked with commanding contingents of the army. Imparati F. 1999a, 167-172 argues, this shows that the king thus chose individuals who were native to the area to carry out military operations there. Mouton A. 2007b, 554-555 considers the possibility whether the Ḫarranaziti in this text (as well as in KUB 15.17+, see Imparati F. 1999a, 171) is the same individual as the husband of a woman whose death is potentially foreshadowed in the oracular inquiry KBo 18.142.
|
